URBN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abercrombie & Fitch has a net margin of 8.15% compared to Urban Outfitters's net margin of 7.33%. Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 19.26% beat Abercrombie & Fitch's return on equity of 43.48%.

Urban Outfitters has a consensus price target of $71.37, signalling downside risk potential of -3.05%. On the other hand Abercrombie & Fitch has an analysts' consensus of $113.37 which suggests that it could grow by 26.18%. Given that Abercrombie & Fitch has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Abercrombie & Fitch is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abercrombie & Fitch has a beta of 1.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.53%.

Urban Outfitters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abercrombie & Fitch offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Urban Outfitters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abercrombie & Fitch pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Abercrombie & Fitch quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Urban Outfitters's net income of $108.3M is higher than Abercrombie & Fitch's net income of $80.4M. Notably, Urban Outfitters's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.40x while Abercrombie & Fitch's PE ratio is 8.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Outfitters is 1.22x versus 0.94x for Abercrombie & Fitch. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dick's Sporting Goods has a net margin of 8.15% compared to Urban Outfitters's net margin of 8.33%. Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 19.26% beat Dick's Sporting Goods's return on equity of 38.67%.

Urban Outfitters has a consensus price target of $71.37, signalling downside risk potential of -3.05%. On the other hand Dick's Sporting Goods has an analysts' consensus of $204.70 which suggests that it could fall by -0.84%. Given that Urban Outfitters has more downside risk than Dick's Sporting Goods, analysts believe Dick's Sporting Goods is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dick's Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.617%.

Urban Outfitters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dick's Sporting Goods offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.21 per share. Urban Outfitters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods pays out 31.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Dick's Sporting Goods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Dick's Sporting Goods quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Urban Outfitters's net income of $108.3M is lower than Dick's Sporting Goods's net income of $264.3M. Notably, Urban Outfitters's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.40x while Dick's Sporting Goods's PE ratio is 14.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Outfitters is 1.22x versus 1.25x for Dick's Sporting Goods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ross Stores has a net margin of 8.15% compared to Urban Outfitters's net margin of 9.61%. Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 19.26% beat Ross Stores's return on equity of 39.39%.

Urban Outfitters has a consensus price target of $71.37, signalling downside risk potential of -3.05%. On the other hand Ross Stores has an analysts' consensus of $151.01 which suggests that it could grow by 14.82%. Given that Ross Stores has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe Ross Stores is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ross Stores has a beta of 1.110, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.014%.

Urban Outfitters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ross Stores offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Urban Outfitters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores pays out 23.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Ross Stores's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Ross Stores quarterly revenues of $5B. Urban Outfitters's net income of $108.3M is lower than Ross Stores's net income of $479.2M. Notably, Urban Outfitters's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.40x while Ross Stores's PE ratio is 20.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Outfitters is 1.22x versus 2.04x for Ross Stores. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TJX Companies has a net margin of 8.15% compared to Urban Outfitters's net margin of 7.9%. Urban Outfitters's return on equity of 19.26% beat TJX Companies's return on equity of 59.85%.

Urban Outfitters has a consensus price target of $71.37, signalling downside risk potential of -3.05%. On the other hand TJX Companies has an analysts' consensus of $139.59 which suggests that it could grow by 11.39%. Given that TJX Companies has higher upside potential than Urban Outfitters, analysts believe TJX Companies is more attractive than Urban Outfitters.

Urban Outfitters has a beta of 1.440, which suggesting that the stock is 43.983% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TJX Companies has a beta of 0.882, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.812%.

Urban Outfitters has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TJX Companies offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Urban Outfitters pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TJX Companies pays out 33.88% of its earnings as a dividend. TJX Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Urban Outfitters quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than TJX Companies quarterly revenues of $13.1B. Urban Outfitters's net income of $108.3M is lower than TJX Companies's net income of $1B. Notably, Urban Outfitters's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.40x while TJX Companies's PE ratio is 29.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Urban Outfitters is 1.22x versus 2.50x for TJX Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.